APHC010491572003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6693/2003 Between: 1. P.V.V.S.V.PRASAD, - ...PETITIONER AND 1. D A AGM ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE2 ORS, - ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 8733 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 24817 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of W.P.No.6693 of 2003 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 243800 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to implead the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Rep. by its Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, Plot No.5, Institutional Area. 2 Sector 32, Gurgaon — 122001, as 4th respondent in W.P No.6693 of 2003, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 243805 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to implead the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Rep. by its Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, Plot No.5, Institutional Area. Sector 32, Gurgaon — 122001, as 4th respondent in W.P2Co.6693 of 2003, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C S K V RAMANAMURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. HANUMANTHA RAO BACHINA 2. . 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.09.2025 and 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 161 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:6693 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025 MP