HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5447 of 2017 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant (s). 3. Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present. 4. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Pawan @ Pawan Kumar with the prayer to quash/set aside the order dated 16.1.2017 passed by FTC/Addl. District Judge, Hathras in S.T. No.390 of 2015 (State Vs. Pawan) by which the said Court rejected the application submitted by the applicant for looking the C.D. and chip by playing in proper instrument for evidence in relation to Case Crime No.0137 of 2015, u/s 376 and 452 IPC, P.S. Mursan, District Hathras pending before FTC/Addl. District Judge, Hathras and further to direct the court concerned to look the C.D. and chip by playing in proper instrument for evidence in relation to Case Crime No.0137 of 2015, u/s 376 and 452 IPC, P.S. Mursan, District Hathras pending before FTC/Addl. District Judge, Hathras. 5. On the last occasion i.e. 1.9.2025, learned counsel for the applicant had prayed for time to seek instructions regarding status of trial. The same reads as under:- "1. List revised. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kumar Gautam, Vimlesh Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pawan @ Pawan Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 2. Sri Raj Kumar Gautam, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State are present. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant prays for an adjournment in the matter for ten days to seek instructions regarding the status of trial. The order sheet of the matter shows that there is no interim order passed in it. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Let the matter be listed on 15.09.2025. " 6. Today despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant, no one appears to press this matter. 7. This matter is reported by the office through the report dated 3.3.2025 of Registrar (J) (Listing) that it is likely to be infructuous. 8. Perused the records. 9. Since there is no one appearing on behalf of the applicant(s) to press this application U/s 482 Cr.P.C., the matter being likely to have become infructuous by efflux of time, the same is dismissed as such. 10. The present application is dismissed as infructuous. 11. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 12. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the District and Sessions Judge/trial court concerned within a week. September 15, 2025 Gaurav Kuls A482 No. 5447 of 2017 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad