Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50710 (ALL)

SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/13209/2025 · 2025-04-29

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67301-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13209 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus restraining the respondent-Authority from preventing him from carrying on squatting from the place, he has been doing business since last 10 to 12 years. The petitioner is claiming rights under the provisions of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. 2. Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, Development Authority, states that Grievance Redressal Committee as envisaged under the said legislation would be formed within a week. She further submits that in case, the petitioner raises his grievance before the said Committee, it would be duly considered. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid stand of the respondent, Development Authority, we dispose of the instant petition by providing that the respondent, Development Authority, would constitute Grievance Redressal Committee within a week and it shall be open to the petitioner to raise his grievance before the said Committee and in which event, the Committee will decide the representation expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. 4. The order has been passed in presence of Shri Chandra Prakash Yadav, counsel for respondent No. 3 & 8. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Mukesh Kr. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad