Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50706 (ALL)

SMT. ADLINE HARRISON v. U.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER

WRIC/13563/2025 · 2025-05-01

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:70486-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13563 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Adline Harrison Respondent :- U.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Ahmad Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- Ajay Singh,Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has made the following prayers:- "(a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned demand notice no.5001/Sect-3/EUDSD-Kareli/Prj of Section 3 dated 2.12.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 being Annexure no.2 to the petition. (b). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondent no.2 to reject the demand notice dated 2.12.2024 and to issue the Office Memorandum on that demand notice so that in near future no any recovery may take place against her. (c). Issue any other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper considering the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. In the present writ petition it appears that a complaint has been filed by the petitioner before the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Prayagraj, which has not been decided yet. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Prayagraj should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the complaint filed by the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Prayagraj is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the complaint filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. For a period of two months no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. 7. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Dev (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad