: i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 638 OF 2025 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents and to punish them for willful and intentional violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in WP.No.18451/2021 dated 28.04.2023 under Section 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act Between: T. Nageswara ’’ao, S/o Late T.Ganapathi Rao, Aged 63 years, Retired Enforcement Inspector, Intelligence Wing, Special Enforcement Bureau, R/o D.No. 10-8/4, Teachers Layout, Opp.Sairam Colony, Kommadi Junction, Madhurawada Visakhapatnam-530048 ...PETITIONER AND 1. Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Nisanth Kumar, I.A.S,, Director, Prohibition and Excise Commissionarate 3 Floor, IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh 522503 rd ...CONTEMNORS Counsel for the Petitioner :Sri. Harinath Reddy Somagutta Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Sreekanth Reddy Ambati For RR1,2 The Court made the following Order : APHC010115642025 \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 638/2025 Between: T. Nageswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND Mukesh Kumar Meena IAS and another ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.HARINATH REDDY SOMAGUTTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO. 638 of 202^ ORDER; Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order, dated 28.04.2023 of this Court passed in W.P.No.18451 of 2021 has been complied with by the respondents. On earlier occasion also, learned counsel represented the same and as there is representation for the petitioner, this Court directed to list the matter today under caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner today also. no Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ' SD/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS, Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Nisanth Kumar, l.A.S, Director, Prohibition and Excise Floor, IHC Corporate Building, Mangalagiri, rd Commissionarate 3 Andhra Pradesh 522503 3. One CC to Sri. Harinath Reddy Somagutta, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies YM (■ HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER CC.No.638 of 2025 St r) g( 0 7 AUG 2025 3-jsCBrfentSecIlMx^y CONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS