Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50702 (ALL)

GIRIRAJ KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/5646/2025 · 2025-07-23

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121648 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5646 of 2025 Petitioner :- Giriraj Kumar Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Aditya Bhushan Singhal,C.S.C.,Suresh Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel for respondent – Jal Nigam and Ms. Divya Chaurasia, learned counsel for respondent – L.I.C. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner, on basis of instructions, submits that all outstanding dues have already been paid by U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) and now grievance is left only for payment towards insurance and for that L.I.C. is Competent Authority, however, it is not impleaded as party-respondent in this writ petition. 3. Ms. Divya Chaurasia, who generally appears for L.I.C. and present in this Court submits that in normal circumstances by now, money must have been paid by L.I.C. to concerned respondent-employer and it is duty of concerned employer to distribute to employee and in case it is not paid till date, she will verify the same and L.I.C. will take all endeavour to pay said amount to respondent-employer who will pay to petitioner thereafter. 4. In aforesaid circumstances, considering submissions of learned counsel for parties, since the issue is between respondent -employer and respondent – L.I.C., therefore, they will ensure that payment towards insurance be paid to petitioner within a short period. 5. Writ petition stands disposed of with above observations. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 N. Sinha Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad