APHC010193682022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 12553/2022 Between: 1. MADALA TIRUPATHI NAIDU, S/O.VENKAIAH NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PAMIDIPADU VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DT., 2. MADALA UMAMAHESWARI, W/O.MADALA TIRUPATHI NAIDU,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PAMIDIPADU VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DT., 3. MADALA SRINIVASULU, S/O.VENKATESWARULU AGED ABOUT35 YEARS, PAMIDIPADU VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DT., 4. MANIKONDA PAVANI, W/O.VAMSIKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O, ADITYA NAGAR, NEAR CHILDREN'S PARK NELLORE CITY 5. MANIKONDA VAMSIKRISHNA, S/O.N.ARAYANA RAOAGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O, ADITYA NAGAR, NEAR CHILDREN'S PARK NELLORE CITY ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI 2. SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DT., 3. DY SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, ATMAKURU SUB-DIVISION, ATMAKURU, SPSR NELLORE DT., 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, UDAYGIRI POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DT., 5. POTHURI SUBBARAJU, S/O, SURAPARAJU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O, HYDERABAD CITY PH .9948875515 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 2 4 in interfering in the Civil Dispute and registering the F.I.R in F.I.R No17/2022 dt.15-02-22 on the file of Udaygiri police station, SPSR NELLORE Dt against petitioners as bad illegal void null violation of principles natural justice non-application of mind and unconstitutional and further to quash the F.I.R No17/2022 dt.15-02-22 on the file of Udaygiri police station, SPSR NELLORE Dt as the same is contrary to Judgements of Apex Court and this Hon'ble Court and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to not to interfere with the petitioners day to day business affairs and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased this Hon`ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent 3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to police station for the purpose of compromise with the 5th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in interfering in the Civil Dispute and registering the F.I.R in F.I.R No17/2022 dt.15-02-22 on the file of Udaygiri police station, SPSR NELLORE Dt against petitioners as bad illegal void null violation of principles natural justice non- application of mind and unconstitutional and further to quash the F.I.R No17/2022 dt.15-02-22 on the file of Udaygiri police station, SPSR NELLORE Dt as the same is contrary to Judgements of Apex Court and this Hon'ble Court and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to not to interfere with the petitioners day to day business affairs and to pass ...” None represented for the Petitioners. At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State on instructions would submit that the crime is investigated and charge sheet is filed by the respondent Police before the concerned trial Court and would submit that appropriate orders may be passed by disposing of this Writ Petition. In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioners are liberty to recourse the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 12553 of 2022 04.11.2025 Mjl /*