ANSH SINGH @ SARVESH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/14799/2025 · 2025-07-20
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50701 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50701 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118679 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14799 of 2025 Applicant :- Ansh Singh @ Sarvesh Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rai,Avesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
1. Learned A.G.A. has filed copy of compliance affidavit, today in court, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly. 2. As per compliance affidavit, notice is served upon O.P. No. 2 through his brother, who is represented through counsel. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant (Opposite Party No. 2) as well as learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party No. 1 and perused the record on Board. 4. The applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS to set aside the impugned orders dated 31.07.2018 and 22.10.2019 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Allahabad in Special Session Trial No. 63 of 2016 (State Versus Rohit Shukla and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 464 of 2016, under Sections 395 I.P.C., 3(2)(5) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Colonelganj, District Allahabad. 5. It is submitted that previously applicant was enlarged on bail, however, at subsequent stage, he could not appear before the court due to personal difficulty, which led to issuance of non-bailable warrant against him. It is submitted that present applicant is ready and willing to appear before the court below to cooperate in the trial. He has never intended to avoid the court proceedings, as such, interim protection may be granted so that he may appear before the court below and participate in the court proceedings. 6. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the O.P No.2 has no objection in case protection is granted to the present applicant to enable him to appear before the court below to participate in the court proceedings. 7.
In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present application, without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the present application, with a direction that in case present applicant appears/surrenders and move bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today, same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter. 8. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicant in aforesaid criminal case. 9. As per observation made above, instant application is disposed of. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 T.S. Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad