Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50691 (AP)

Budida Kanaka Raju, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7202/2019 · 2025-12-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010166812019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7202/2019 Between: 1. BUDIDA KANAKA RAJU,, S/O LATE VENKATA RAO, AGED.ABOUT 51 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF ADHITYANAYANI NON WOVEN BAGS MANUFACTURING PLANT, DOOR NO. 5-69, LR STREET, THUMMAPALA SIVARU, KOTTAVURU VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKAHPATNAM, 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ or direction preferably Writ in the nature of Mandamu's declaring the inaction of the 3'j respondent in conducting the investigation in Crime No. 234 of 2018 of Anakapalli Town Police Station , Visakhapatnam District, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to conduct and complete investigation by filing the Charge Sheet/Final Report 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct and complete investigation in Crime No. 234 of 2018 of Anakapalli Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the Writ petition in the interests of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7202 of 2019 ORDER: Sri Ravi Teja, learned counsel representing Sri Y. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 4th December, 2025 cbn 4 70 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 7202 OF 2019 4th December, 2025 cbn