Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5068 (UTT)

JASPAL SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/631/2025 · 2025-04-25

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3079 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 631 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mrs. Manju Bahugun, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Jaspal Singh’ S/o Balvinder Singh is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 09.02.2025 bearing FIR No. 0044 of 2025 P.S. ITI, District Udham Singh Nagar, whrein, the present applicant along wih one Vipin were implicated for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 read with Section 60 of NDPS Act, 1985. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and is languishing in jail since 10.02.2025. She submits that there is no proper compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act. 5. Apart from this, she submits that the alleged contraband Ganja, which was shown to be recovered from the applicant, is below a commercial quantity and the other co-accused Vipin was already enlarged on bail on 09.04.2025 in Bail Application No. 427 of 2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. Mr. V.S. Pal have not disputed this fact that the alleged contraband which was shown to be recovered from the applicant is below a commercial quantity and furthermore the applicant have no previous criminal history and he has also not disputed this fact that the other co-accused Vipin have already been enlarged on bail. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the alleged contraband, which was shown to be recovered from the applicant, is below a commercial quantity and furthermore the other co-accused have also been enlarged on bail this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 2025:UHC:3079 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Jaspal Singh’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.04.2025 PR