APHC010792832016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32566/2016 Between: 1. VATTIGUNTA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O CHINNA PULLA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.1780, FCI COLONY, RAYAPUPALEM, RAJUPALEM DONKA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANNASALAI, CHENNAI. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, POGATHOTA, NELLORE BRANCH, TRUNK ROAD, NELLORE. 3. AVADHANAM SATYA SAI, S/O VISWANATHA SARMA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O USMANSAHEBPET, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the property bearing Door No.1780, FCI Colony, Rayapupalem, Rajupalem Donka, Nellore and further direct the 2nd respondent to consider the legal notice dated 25.2.2016 got issued on behalf of the petitioner for reschedule of the loan account No.212903351200006 declaring their action as 2 JS,J W.P.No.32566/2016 illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 40295 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to dispossess the petitioner from the property bearing Door No.1780, FCI Colony, Rayapupalem, Rajupalem Donka, Nellore without considering the legal notice dated 25.2.2016 got issued on behalf of the petitioner for reschedule of the loan account No. 212903351200006, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 JS,J W.P.No.32566/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 07.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.32566/2016 170 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32566/2016 Date: 07.10.2025 KAS