1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA AND SHRI V.P. VADAVI, MEMBER CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100162/2019 LOK ADALAT NO.238/2025 BETWEEN: SRI. AMEERKHURSHID S/O. MAHMMED ISAK GADYAL, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: BEHIND HANUMAN TEMPLE, RAMPUR, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI K.M. SHIRALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. VAJRAKANT S/O. CHANDRASHEKAR GIRISAGAR, AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: VIDYA NAGAR, NEAR BUS STAND, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.C. HUKKERI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 02.01.2015 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, BANAHATTI IN C.C.NO.374/2008 AND JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 19.01.2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT TO SIT AT: JAMKHANDI, IN CRL.A.NO.4/2015 AND 2 ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE CHARGE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT AFTER BEING REFERRED BY THE COURT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the revision petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent and the respondent are present. 2. The parties are identified by their respective advocates. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. The revision petitioner/accused has agreed to pay and the respondent/complainant has agreed to receive a total sum of Rs.80,000/- (Eighty Thousand Rupees Only), in full and final settlement of the case. A joint Memo is filed on behalf of the parties to this effect, which reads as under: “JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO The Petitioner and the Respondent are compromised the above case on following conditions: These cheque in question is for Rs.40,000/- (Forty thousand). The Petitioner is agreed to pay a sum of Rs.80,000/- (Eighty Thousand) and the Respondent is 3 agreed to take Rs.80,000/- (Eighty Thousand) and both are settle this matter. The petitioner has deposited Rs.1000/- towards fine on 24.01.2015 receipt No.0067265 before the Hon’ble J.M.F.C., Banahatti. The Petitioner has deposited Rs.20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand) on 24.01.2015 receipt No.0067264 before the Hon’ble J.M.F.C. Court, Banahatti. The Respondent has to take the amount of Rs.20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand only) from the Court below. The Petitioner on this day paying Rs.60,000/- (Rs.Sixty Thousand only) cash to the Respondent before this Lok Adalath. The Respondent has received said Rs.60,000/- (Rs. Sixty Thousand only) from the Petitioner. Both Petitioner and Respondent pray to close of the above case. Hence this Compromise Petition.” 3. The same is read over and explained to the parties which they have admitted as true and correct. The joint memo is accepted which is found to be legal. 4 4. In the event the amounts are not paid in terms of the joint memo, the parties are at liberty to seek for re-opening of the present proceedings or to initiate execution proceedings for recovery of money. 5. The criminal revision petition is disposed of in terms of the joint memo. Accordingly, judgment and order of conviction is set aside. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER MRK CT: UMD.