Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5067 (BOM)

SHAIKH HUSSAIN S/O. DADABHAI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLN/16/2021 · 2025-02-20

Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

902-wp-1052-2020f -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1052 OF 2020 PRASHANT S/O. MAHADEORAO BODAKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kamble Neha B, Bolkar Yogesh B. And Wakle Sandip Ashok For Applicant (consent Obtained), Wakle Sandip Ashok, Bolkar Yogesh B. APP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5/State : Mr. A. B. Girase & Mr.A. R. Kale Advocate for Respondent Nos.12,14 & 15: Mr.Kewal Hiralal Dongre, Mr. Latange Vijay Prabhakarrao, Mr. Pande Shashikant R., Mr. Patil Vijay Bhalerao Advocate for Respondent No.7 : Mr. Latange Vijay Prabhakarrao Advocate for Respondent No.16 :Mr. Pande Shashikant R. 16 Advocate for Respondent No.24 : Mr. N.S. Muthiyan & Mr. K.S. Kahalekar Advocate for Respondent Nos. 9&10 : Mr.Suvidh S. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent Nos. 19 to 23 : Mr.S. A. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No.8 : Mr. U. B. Gite Advocate for Respondent No. 12 : Mr. R. M. Shaikh ... WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2021 IN WP/1052/2020 SHAIKH HUSSAIN S/O. DADABHAI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Saeed S. Shaikh APP for Respondents: Mr. A. B. Girase & Mr.A. R. Kale WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 641 OF 2025 IN WP/1052/2020 UTTAM NAGOJI RAUT 2025:BHC-AUG:5232-DB 902-wp-1052-2020f -2- VERSUS ADVASI PANTHER KAMGAR SANGHATAN PRESIDENT PRASHANT MAHADEORAO BOADAKHE AND OTHERS … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhale Kavita S. APP for Respondents: Mr. A. B. Girase & Mr.A. R. Kale ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 20th FEBRUARY 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and after disinclination is shown to grant any relief to the petitioner; upon instructions, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the Petition. 2. Hence, Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Pending Applications stand disposed of. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE Narwade/