HARIHAR DHAR AND ORS. v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.
WPA/105/2025 · 2025-04-21
Aniruddha Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50666 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50666 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. 2
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 06.08.2025
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Daily List Item No. 04)
Appellate Side
(Moumita)
W.P.A. 105 of 2025
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2025
Harihar Dhar & Ors.
Vs.
The State Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Arup Banerjee
…. For the Petitioner
in CAN 1 of 2025
Ms. Manika Roy
Ms. Ankita Chowdhury
Mr. Atanu Sur
…..For Applicant/Respondent no. 3
In Re: CAN 1 of 2025
Ms. Manika Roy, learned counsel appears for the applicants/respondent nos. 3 and 4 in the writ petition.
In her usual fairness, she submits that the presence of respondent no. 5 in this application that is the Pension Sanctioning Authority is necessary and despite effort being taken, she could not served the application.
In view of the above, the applicants shall serve copy of the application upon the respondent no. 5/Pension Sanctioning Authority and file an affidavit-of- service when the matter shall be taken up next.
Mr. Arup Banerjee, learned advocate appears for the writ petitioners being respondent nos. 1 to 4 in the application.
2
The application shall appear under the heading ‘Application’ on September 16, 2025.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)