Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50666 (CAL)

HARIHAR DHAR AND ORS. v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/105/2025 · 2025-04-21

Aniruddha Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 2 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 06.08.2025 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Daily List Item No. 04) Appellate Side (Moumita) W.P.A. 105 of 2025 I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2025 Harihar Dhar & Ors. Vs. The State Bank of India & Ors. Mr. Arup Banerjee …. For the Petitioner in CAN 1 of 2025 Ms. Manika Roy Ms. Ankita Chowdhury Mr. Atanu Sur …..For Applicant/Respondent no. 3 In Re: CAN 1 of 2025 Ms. Manika Roy, learned counsel appears for the applicants/respondent nos. 3 and 4 in the writ petition. In her usual fairness, she submits that the presence of respondent no. 5 in this application that is the Pension Sanctioning Authority is necessary and despite effort being taken, she could not served the application. In view of the above, the applicants shall serve copy of the application upon the respondent no. 5/Pension Sanctioning Authority and file an affidavit-of- service when the matter shall be taken up next. Mr. Arup Banerjee, learned advocate appears for the writ petitioners being respondent nos. 1 to 4 in the application. 2 The application shall appear under the heading ‘Application’ on September 16, 2025. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)