Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50661 (KAR)

SMT. MAHADEVI W/O SANNA HANUMANTHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WA/100252/2025 · 2025-04-29

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7028-DB WA No.100252 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO.100252 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MAHADEVI, W/O SANNA HANUMANTHA, AGE. 34 YEARS, OCC. VEGETABLES AND FRUITS VENDOR, R/O WARD NO.5, KANAKAGIRI POST AND TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT-583283. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SATHISH M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT & PANCHAYAT RAJ, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001. 2. THE CHIEF OFFICER, TOWN PANCHAYATH OFFICE, KANAKAGIRI 583283. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL WHILE SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.100149/2025 (GM-RES) DATED 08.04.2025 & ETC. THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7028-DB WA No.100252 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Sri. V.S. Kalasurmath, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.1. 2. Sri. Satish M.S., learned counsel appearing for the appellant files a Memo, dated 29.04.2025 seeking withdrawal of the appeal, which reads as follows: “The appellant has filed the above appeal challenging the order passed by learned Single Judge in W.P. No.100149/2025 dated 08.04.2025. The appellant herein seeks to withdraw the above appeal with a liberty to file Civil suit before competent Court of Law, in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. In terms of the Memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Pending I.As., if any, are disposed of as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KMS LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 10