Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5065 (JHR)

Janeshwar Mahto Alias Janeshwar Singh And Anr v. Land Reforms And Revenue Department

WPC/1863/2016 · 2025-07-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:20580] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1863 of 2016 ------ 1. Janeshwar Mahto @ Janeshwar Singh, S/o Late Permeshwar Mahto 2. Raj Kishore Mahto @ Raj Kishore Singh, S/o Late Kameshwar Mahto Both R/o village- Chucharu, P.O. Gulabjhari, P.S. Chhatarpur, District- Palamau. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms and Revenue Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 2. Deputy Commissioner, Palamau Office at Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, At/ P.O./ P.S.- Daltonganj, District- Palamau. 3. Additional Collector, Palamau Court of Additional Collector Palamau, At/ P.O./ P.S. Daltonganj, District- Palamau. 4. Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Deputy Collector Land Raforms Chhatarpur Court of Deputy Collector Land Reforms Chhatarpur, At/ P.O./ P.S.- Chhatarpur, District- Palamau. 5. Shyam Dev Singh, S/o Late Shital Singh 6. Sunil Singh, S/o Ram Swaroop Singh 7. Suneshwar Ram, S/o Late Baham Dev Ram 8. Mundrika Yadav, S/o Late Bijali Yadav 9. Jhari Devi, W/o Bijay Yadav Nos.5 to 9 R/o Village- Pokhraha, P.O. Gulabjhari, P.S. Chhatarpur, District- Palamau. 10. Ram Lakhan Sao, S/o Late Ram Prasad Sao 11. Om Prakash Singh, S/o Late Muni Singh 12. Satendra Singh, S/o Late Muni Singh Nos. 10 to 12 R/o village- Chucharu, P.O. Gulabjhari, P.S. Chhatarpur, District- Palamau. … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Mr. Ayush Deb, AC to GP IV ------ Order No:-13 Dated:-25-07-2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this Writ Petition, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/