Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50644 (PAT)

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./37496/2025 · 2025-08-01

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37496 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2022 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav S/o Amod yadav R/o Village- Guriya, P.S- Jadiya, District-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Geeta Devi W/o Nepali Pandit R/o Village- Guriya, Ward No. 4, P.S- Jadiya, District- Supaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Renuka Ratnakar(App125) Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 376, 313, 307, 120(B), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner established physical relation with the minor daughter of the informant on the pretext of marrying her. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. The medical report of the victim does not support the prosecu- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37496 of 2025(2) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 tion case. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2024. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel ap- pearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the nature of accusation, claim based on parity, period of custody and clean antecedents of the peti- tioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be re- leased on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thou- sand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfac- tion of learned ADJ-VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Court, Su- paul, in connection with Jadiya P.S. Case No. 319 of 2022. shikha/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T