Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50642 (CHH)

KANHAIYA SINGH (DIED) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/260/2025 · 2025-09-11

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(Rev.Pet.No.260/2025) 2025:CGHC:47371 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 260 of 2025 1. Kanhaiya Singh (Died) through Lrs. As per Hon'ble Court order dated 07.05.2025. 1a. Laxmi Pawar, Wd/o Late Kanhaiya Singh, Aged about 63 years 1b. Lokesh Kumar Pawar, S/o Late Kanhaiya Singh, Aged about 46 years 1c. Abhishek Pawar, S/o Late Kanhaiya Singh, Aged about 43 years All R/o Village Dudiya, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Balod, Distt. Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Collector, Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 3. Sub (Revenue) Divisional Sub Officer, Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.) 4. Tehsildar, Gunderdehi, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.) ... Respondents Single Bench: - Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order (In Chamber) 12/09/2025 SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2025.09.16 11:21:51 +0530 (Rev.Pet.No.260/2025) 1. The above-stated review petition is taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’). 2. I have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. After going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the order under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of the order dated 2-7-2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.5277/2017. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the order under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma