SURINDER KUMAR v. M.K.DIWEDI,SECY.MED.EDUCATION AND ORS.
CPSW/84/2013 · 2025-03-25
Sanjay Dhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5063 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5063 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 84/2013
Surinder Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None. q
vs
M. K. Diwedi and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 25.03.2025
1. Through the medium of present petition, the petitioner is seeking implementation of order dated 23.05.2012 passed by the Writ Court, whereby the respondents were directed to accord consideration to the claim of the petitioner.
2. Statement of facts has been filed by the respondents. It has been submitted by the respondents that in absence of the recommendations for issuing appointment order from the Services Selection Board in favour of the petitioner, the case of the petitioner has been found to be devoid of any merit, hence rejected. In this regard, the respondents have passed the
consideration order dated 23.03.2013.
3. In view of the above, the order of the Writ Court stands complied with. The contempt proceedings are, therefore, closed and the petition is disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 25.03.2025 Rakesh 34 Rakesh Kumar 2025.03.26 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document