M/S YASH ENTERPRISES PROP v. CANARA BANK TILAKWADI (558) BRANCH
WP/102506/2025 · 2025-06-24
Pradeep Singh Yerur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50620 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50620 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7973 WP No. 102506 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 102506 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. YASH ENTERPRISES PROP:
SHRI SACHIN VITHAL PATIL, SY.NO.499/1/2, KANABARGI ROAD, BELAGAVI, TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590016.
2.
SHRI SACHIN VITHAL PATIL, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. OLD GANDHI ROAD, H.NO.69/63/A, BRAMALING GALLI, BELAGAVI, TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590016. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARAD MALGOUND PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
CANARA BANK TILAKWADI (558) BRANCH, P.B. NO.525, 197-D/2 KHANAPUR ROAD, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI, TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MR. VINOD KUMAR S/O. GHANARAM SAHYOGI.
2.
SMT. VANITA VITHAL PATIL, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. OLD GANDHI ROAD, H.NO.69/63/A, BRAMALING GALLI, BELAGAVI, TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI-590016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LINGESH KATTEMANE, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07/12/2024 PASSED BY PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BELAGAVI IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.270/2024 VIDE
CHANABASAPPA K KALLUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD
BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7973 WP No. 102506 of 2025
ANNEXURE-A. AND ALSO QUASH THE SALE NOTICE DATED 07/13/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is present.
Learned counsel Sri.Lingesh Kattemane is directed to take notice for respondent No.1.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
3. Memo and submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner are placed on record.
4. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
KGK CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 18