APHC010199712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12362/2021 Between: 1. T.V.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY, S/O CHANDRASEKHAR, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-19-111/A, 5TH LANE, VIKRS NAGAR, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRI.SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATAMATA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 3. HARISHA CHAMAKURI, D/O.C.RAGHU PRASAD, AGED YEARS, R/O PLOT NO.404, 3RD FLOOR, SRI VENKATESWARA NILAYAM, KOLA VARI STREET, RAMAVARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA. 4. RAJESH DAVULURI, S/O D.SARASWATHY, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.131, BLOCK I, MANOJ VIHAR APARTMENTS, BESIDE JAIPURI MALL, INDIRAPURAM, I.E.SABIBABAD, GHAZIABAD, UTTAR PRADESH. 5. CHAMAKURI MOHANA SWETHA, D/O C.RAGHU PRASAD, AGED YEARS, R/O PLOY NO.404, 3RD FLOOR, SRI VENKATESWARA NILAYAM, KOLA VARI STREET, RAMAVARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA. 6. KARTHIK BIRADAWADA, S/O B.MUNI KRISHNAIAH, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO.7/50, PALAVALLI VARI STREET, RAGHAVAYAPETA, NEAR RAILWAY TRACK, SULURPETA, 2 NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering in a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents no.3 to 6, without following due process of law as being arbitrary, illegal, against the provisions of the Code of Criminal Priocedure,1973 and unconstitutional and consequentially direct the 2nd respondent not to summon or arrest the petitioner and not to interfere in the transactions between the petitioner and respondents no.3 to 6 IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to summon the, petitioner to the Police Station pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PRANATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in interfering in a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents nos.3 to 6 without following due process of law as being arbitrary, illegal, against the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and unconstitutional and consequentially direct the 2nd respondent not to summon or arrest the petitioner and not to interfere in the transactions between the petitioner and respondents nos.3 to 6 and pass.” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint of the respondent No.6, the police have registered a case against the petitioner in Crime No.434 of 2021 of Patamata Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 509 IPC. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025 SNI 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12362 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 SNI 723