Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50612 (KAR)

SHRI. HANAMANTHAPPA S/O BASANAGOUDA BEDRANAIK v. SHRI. LAKKAPPA S/O TAMMANNA GHASTI

RSA/100235/2024 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 100235/2024(SP) BETWEEN 1 . SHRI. HANAMANTHAPPA S/O BASANAGOUDA BEDRANAIK AGE 61 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/O HIRENANDI 591233 TQ GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. : A S PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SHRI. LAKKAPPA S/O TAMMANNA GHASTI AGE 68 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/O BADAGI, TQ BILAGI DIST: BAGALKOTE, R/O: HIRENANDI 591233 TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. &RESPONDENT RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.12.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.33/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GOKAK, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.04.2022, 2 PASSED IN O.S. NO.457/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, GOKAK, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks9 time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 24.03.2025 Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100235/2024 stands dismissed without further reference to the Bench for non-prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: psl