1 2025:CGHC:55074 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12690 of 2025 • Kishore Kumar Jaiswal S/o Shiv Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School, Dugru, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh And Is Now In-Charge Cluster Co-Ordinator At Cluster Centre Sanawal-B, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Managing Director State Project Office Samagra Shiksha, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Collector/ District Mission Director Samagra Shiksha, Balrampur- Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 4. District Education Officer Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5. District Mission Coordinator Samagra Shiksha, Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 6. Block Education Officer Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 7. Kashiram Dhurve Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Government Middle School, Baraitand, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondent/State. : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 2 and 5 Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate. (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 12/11/2025 1. By the impugned order dated 27-8-2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No.5 ie., District Mission Coordinator, Samagra Shiksha, Balarampur-Ramanujganj, District Balarampur-Ramanujganj, additional charge given to the petitioner as Cluster Coordinator has been withdrawn and in his place respondent No.7 Kashiram Dhruve has been given charge of Cluster Coordinator. 2. Since it is only additional charge which does not effect the service condition of the petitioner, no fundamental right of the petitioner is violated, as such the writ petition is not maintainable. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition being devoid of merit of is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.13 11:51:46 +0530