Gurucharan, S/o. Late P.S. Rao v. Ponnala Rojaramani, W/o. Gurucharan,
FCA/112/2007 · 2025-12-30
Battu Devanand, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50611 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50611 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC011264932007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3564] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 112/2007 Between:
1. GURUCHARAN, S/O. LATE P.S. RAO, EMPLOYEE,R/O. 6, JEEVAN JYOTHI ENCLAVE, DAYALBAGH, AGRA, PRESENTLY R/O. D.NO.
117/L/453, CHENNY HOUSE, IST FLOOR, NAVEEN NAGAR, KANPOOR-9. (UTTAR PRADESH).
...APPELLANT AND
1. PONNALA ROJARAMANI W/O GURUCHARAN, Employee, R/o. D.No.4-35-15/A, Saisampath Enclave, Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam, presently she is in working in Synergies Dooray Automotive Limited, Duvvada, Special Economie Zone, Plot No.3, and 4 Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 194 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 38 days in filing the FCA against the decree and
judgment made in OP No.133/2003 on the file of the court of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NAKARIKANTI PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent:
2
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.112 of 2007
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
On 03.12.2025, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is posted to 17.12.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. On 24.12.2025 also, there is no representation for the appellant. To give one more opportunity to the appellant, the appeal is posted to today. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
2. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this Appeal.
3. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 31.12.2025 TM
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.112 of 2007
Dated: 31.12.2025 TM