1 APHC010340052024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17272/2024 Between: 1. DARLA HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DARLA RAMESH KUMAR, S/O. KANTHAIAH, HINDU, AGE 57 YRS. ADDRESS AT D. NO. 54-14/1-73, FLAT NO. 62, ROAD NO. 2, NEAR TATA MOTORS, SRINIVASA NAGAR, BANK COLONY, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDA KAKANI POLICE STATION, GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. MEKA MAMATHA, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGE 41 YRS, OCC- HOUSE MAKER, R/O. FLAT NO. 708, WILLOWS (PHASE-2) BLOCK, RAIN TREE PARK DWARAKA KRISHNA APARTMENTS, OPP A.N.U CAMPUS, NAMBURU, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 508. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDIPARTHI V RATNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, direct the Respondent no. 3 herein not to interfere in Civil disputes and consequently the Respondent no.3 herein is not to harassing the Petitioner by calling him to the Police Station and to grant such other relief or reliefs as 2 this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstance of the case.” 2. Heard Sri K.V.Ratnakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on the contents of the complaint made by respondent No.4, a case in Crime No.287 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 read with 34 IPC has been registered against the petitioner. Except that, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.12.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17272 of 2024 Dt..22.12.2025 Asr