Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50601 (KAR)

SANTARAM S/O MALLARI SALUNKE v. MAHADEV S/O MALLARI SALUNKE

RFA/100389/2024 · 2025-02-05

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO.100389 OF 2024 BETWEEN SANTARAM S/O MALLARI SALUNKE AGE 59 YEARS, OCC. AGRICUTLURE R/O TODALBAGI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT 587301 ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRISH A. YADAWAD, SMT. DIVYA J. DESHPANDE AND SRI. RAHUL S. KUNTOJI ADVOCATES) AND MAHADEV S/O MALLARI SALUNKE AGE 54 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O TODALBAGI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT 587301 AND OTHERS &RESPONDENTS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.04.2024 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JAMKHANDI IN O.S.NO.16/2020, INSOFAR AS IT PERTAINS TO ALLOWING THE COUNTER CLAIM MADE BY DEFENDANT NOS.5(A) TO 5(C). AND DISMISS THE COUNTER CLAIM MADE BY DEFENDANT 5A TO 5C IN O.S.NO.16/2020, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING; 2 O R D E R Four weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE Note : As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 04.04.2025, the Advocate for the Appellant has not complied office objection. Hence, this RFA No.100389/2024 The appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated: 05.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: cmu C- By: sgs