Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50601 (AP)

B VEERAMALLAMMA @ MALLIKA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/25540/2025 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010485632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25540 OF 2025 Between: B Veeramallamma @ Mallika, W/o V. Venkata Subba Reddy, Aged about 44 years, R/o NaHa Parvatayyagari Palli, Veeraballi Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Tbe State Of Andhra Prad^shj Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amravati, Guntur District. 2. The Station House Officer, The Station House Officer, I Town P.S., Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3. The Station House Officer, Ohinna Chowk Police Station, Kadapa, Kadapa District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit'filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus deqIaFing the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering into matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and her husband and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the matrimonial disputes with her husband and also forcibly obtained signatures on typed papers which / J ‘-> /■e is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the'2nd ;and 3rd respondents not to interfere in the matrimonial disputes betwe.#vihd petitioner and her husband and not to register false cases against the petitioner, her relatives. / lA NO: 1 OF 2025 *• j--- Petition under Section 15.1 C|?C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support offthe petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"^' and 3^^ respondehts npt to interfere into the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and her husband and not to call to Police Station and intimidate the petitioner or relatives by registering false cases against the petitioner. Pending disposal of the pboye writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIIHARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 3: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: ;p:; JVC t; >- % V', 'rv. « •'•I : t 'i -f APHC010485632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25540/2025 Between: 1.B VEERAMALLAMMA @ MALLIKA, W/0 V. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY. AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/0 NALLA PARVATAYYAGARI PALLI, VEERABALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME SECRETARIAT, DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN P.S., KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER STATION, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. CHINNA CHOWK POLICE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering into matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and her husband and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the matrimonial disputes with her husband and also forcibly obtained signatures on typed papers which is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in the matrimonial disputes between register false cases against the lA NO: 1 OF in .he'affi'd”i,Te"in:u»ortoir‘' direct the 2 and S""'' respondent^ nm t"^* ? ‘’® Pleased to disputes between the petitioner and h k ° ‘ii® matrimonial Station and intimidate he e" one o re ate's"?"^ =oT:rr the petitioner and her husband petitioner, her relatives, and pass and not to stated cases petition in the pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25540 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 1 pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in interfering into matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and her husband and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the matrimonial disputes with her husband and also forcibly obtained signatures on typed papers which is illegal, Improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India Consequently direct the 2'^^ and 3 respondents not to Interfere in the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and her husband and not to register false cases against the petitioner her relatives, and pass....’’ rd Heard Sri N.Harinadh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri 2. V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, 3. would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and her husband. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the 3. same, the petition may be disposed of. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed 4. of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the husband. petitioner and her stand Pending, if any, shall \ SD/- G SRINIVAS REDDY DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Principal Secretary. Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amravati, Guntur District. 2. The Station House Officer, The Station House Kadapa, Kadapa District. 3. The Station House Officer, Chinna Chowk Police Kadapa District. 4. One CC to SRI. HARINADH NIDAMANURI Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME High Court of Andhra Pradesh 6. Two CD Copies. Officer, I Town P.S., Station, Kadapa, [OUT] AL r \ \' HIGH COURT \ . DATED:22/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 25540 OF 2025 rr’ *( 0 7 NOV 2025 W^sCyffw*S«ctk '"■^Sesisai c?’. r»i- Co PISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS i