Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5060 (KAR)

PRABHAKAR S/O MALLESHAPPA AGASANAHALLI v. SMT PUSHPA ALIAS LAXMI W/O PRABHAKAR

RPFC/100075/2024 · 2025-01-21

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1131 RPFC No. 100075 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100075 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN: PRABHAKAR S/O. MALLESHAPPA AGASANAHALLI, AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE (NOW NIL), R/O INAMYALLAPUR, TQ. HANAGL, DIS. HAVERI-581104. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERESH GADDADA AND SMT. POOJA M.K., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT. PUSHPA ALIAS LAXMI W/O. PRABHAKAR AGASANAHALLI, AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, ANAND NAGAR, OLD HUBBLLI, HUBBALLI-580020. 2. CHANDAN S/O. PRABHAKAR AGASANAHALLI, AGE. 17 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, ANAND NAGAR, OLD HUBBLLI, HUBBALLI-580020. 3. KUM NANADAN S/O. PRABHAKAR AGASANAHALLI, MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Date: 2025.01.24 13:08:25 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1131 RPFC No. 100075 of 2024 AGE. 15 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, ANAND NAGAR, OLD HUBBLLI, HUBBALLI-580020. NOTE. RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER RESPONDENT NO. 1 ALL ARE RESIDING AT AMBEDKAR NAGAR, ANANDNAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI HUBBALLI – 580020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H N GULARADDI & SRI. G. D. PATIL, ADVOCATES) ------- THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER CRL. MISC. NO.183/2023 DATED 29TH FEBRUARY 2024, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioner in the morning session as well as in the post lunch session. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1131 RPFC No. 100075 of 2024 In that view of the matter, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31