Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 47 of 2025 Date of Decision: 06.06.2025
Bhagmal .. petitioner Versus State of H.P. and ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For respondent No.1 & 2: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. For respondent No.3 : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the cancellation report has been filed as per the status report, he wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Permission granted.
2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 6th June, 2025 (saurav pathania) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.