Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 506 (CHH)

KAMINI v. JAGAT

FA/238/2025 · 2026-02-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 238 of 2025 1 - Kamini W/o Santosh D/o Laakhanlal, Aged About 40 Years, Mother Urmila, Resident Of Omnagar, Jarhabhata Bilaspur, Tehsil And District- Bilaspur , Chhattisgarh. 2 - Kevra Bai W/o Laakhanlal, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 3 - Ramin Bai W/o Krishna D/o Late Laakhanlal Aged About 28 Years , Mother Kevra Bai, Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 4 - Jyoti W/o Rajesh D/o Late Laakhanlal, Aged About 26 Years Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 5 - Rajkumari W/o Umendra D/o Late Laakhanlal, Aged About 24 Years Mother Kevra Bai, Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 6 - Aarti W/o Swaran D/o Late Laakhanlal Aged About 22 Years Mother Kevra Bai Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 7 - Bharti W/o Kamlesh D/o Late Laakhanlal Aged About 20 Years Mother Kevra Bai Resident Of Village- Jarhabhata, Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, ... Appellants versus 1 - Jagat S/o Late Fekulal, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Jarhabhata Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2026.02.02 17:33:16 +0530 2 2 - Krishna S/o Late Fekulal Aged About 45 Years Resident Of Jarhabhata Bilaspur Tehsil And District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellants : None For State/Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, P.L. D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 02/02/2026 1. The matter is listed in default(s), yet no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Prashant