Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50594 (AP)

Vytla Ananda Rao v. The State of A.P.

CRLRC/2847/2018 · 2025-12-04

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010788102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2847/2018 Between: 1. VYTLA ANANDA RAO, CASTE - HINDU, OCC - BUSINESS, R/O. JONNADA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. VYTLA BHAGYA LAKSHMI, CASTE - HINDU, R/O. JONNADA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, through its SHO, Ravulapalem PS, E.G. District. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the Order made in Memo SR.No. 621 of 2018 in CC.No. 1 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram, dated 11-09-2018 and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings including trial in C.C.No.1 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Principal Sessions Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram, pending disposal of the present Criminal Revision Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) O R D E R: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.4 under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 11.09.2018 passed in S.R.No.621 of 2018 in C.C.No.01 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, East Godavari District, (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 11.09.2018 passed in S.R.No.621 of 2018 in C.C.No.01 of 2011. The S.R.No.621 of 2018 has been filed by the prosecution to reconsider the propriety of the charges framed, in accordance with the orders in criminal miscellaneous petition No.1458 of 2016 dated 15.11.2016. By impugned order dated 11.09.2018, the trial Court dismissed the petition, by ascertaining some reasons. Against the said order, the petitioners/A1 & A2 herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and requests to close this matter. 5. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 05.12.2025 M K K THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2847 of 2018 Date: 05.12.2025 M K K 256