Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50584 (CHH)

AMIT KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/6262/2025 · 2025-12-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61692 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6262 of 2025 1 - Amit Kumar Shukla S/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Shukla Aged About 47 Years R/o L-30/31/32, Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Zone Commissioner Zone No. 3, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Building Officer/ Engineer Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Prarthana Choudhry D/o Jagsen Choudhry Aged About 27 Years R/o Magazine Dafai, Ward No. 17, Haldibadi, Chirmiri, Distict Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 : Ms. Upasna Mehta, Dy.Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.2 to 4 : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Advocate BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.18 13:32:56 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 17/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the action taken by respondents/Corporation, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram