Writ Petition No.21342 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Writ Petition No.21342 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.24085 & 24088 of 2025 Kesavan S/o.Late Jayaraman Petitioner Vs 1. Kumaresan S/o.O.M.Perummal 2.Eswari D/o.Kanagaraj 3.Ammu D/o.Kanagaraj 4.Vidya D/o.Kanagaraj 5.Rajendnran S/o.O.M.Perummal 6.Girija D/o.O.M.Perummal 7.Monoharan S/o.O.M.Perummal 8.The Revenue Inspector, Vaniyambadi, Tiruppathur District. Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.21342 of 2025 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records of the Honourable the Subordinate Court, Vaniyambadi, Thiruppathur District, quash its impugned order dated 11.08.2022 in O.S.No.155/2022 and consequently, forbear the eighth respondent from changing any revenue records of the land situated at Mariyamma Koil Street, Uthayethiram Village, Madurai, Mettupalayam Village, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Thiruppathur District, in Survey No.598/9, Old Survey No. 517/3 in total 2476 Sqr feet in case respondents 1 to 7 producing any documents for mutation of records. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Arockia Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr.G.Velu Additional Government Pleader [R8] ***** O R D E R This writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Sub Court, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District, in O.S.No.155 of 2022 dated 11.08.2022 on the ground that a fraud was played and a decree was obtained. 2. Heard Mr.I.Arockia Selvaraj, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.G.Velu, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for eighth respondent. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.21342 of 2025 3. The issue as to whether this Court exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can correct or reverse the civil judgments was referred to the Constitution Bench in Radhey Shyam and another v. Chhabi Nath and others [(2009) 7 MLJ 177 (SC)]. Ultimately, the Larger Bench of Radhey Shyam and others v. Chhabi Nath and others [2015 (2) CTC 334] held that this Court cannot invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and only Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be invoked in this regard. In view of the above judgment, the relief as sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. It is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy by filing an appropriate petition in accordance with law. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 17.06.2025 Neutral Citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order gm To The Revenue Inspector, Vaniyambadi, Tiruppathur District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.21342 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm Writ Petition No.21342 of 2025 17.06.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis