Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:55209
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1531 of 2025 • Anukalp Gupta (Minor) S/o Shri Ajay Kumar Gupta Aged About 11 Years Being A Minor Is Filing The Writ Petitioner, Through His Father I.E. Shri Ajay Kumar Gupta, S/o Ram Prasad Gupta, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Durga Mandir Road, Marwahi, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 495118
... Petitioner(s) versus • Shri Manoj Shrivastava Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Malhar, Bilaspur, Malhar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495551
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Advocate.
(Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Order on Board 12/11/2025
1. Contempt notice has been issued to the respondent and in pursuance of the notice respondent Shri Manoj Shrivastava, Principal Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Malhar, Bilaspur is present along with his Advocate Mr. Ramakant Mishra and they would submit that they have filed the review perdition.
2
2. Since there is no stay against the impugned order, therefore, merely filing of the review petition does not confer any right to the respondent to not obey the order passed by this Court. However, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is the case of admission of Class VIth student and the documents contained that the petitioner was not eligible to be considered, but wrongly it has been considered which has been subsequently canceled.
3. Be that as it may, unless and until the legality and propriety of the impugned
order passed by the learned Single Judge is varied, the order has to be obeyed, therefore, it is directed that the respondent shall allow the admission of the petitioner subject to condition that in case the order passed by the learned single Judge is set aside or varied, the petitioner will not claim parity and his admission will be subject to out come of the judgment passed by the Division Bench or in the Review Petition and this order will not be precedent in future case also.
4. With the aforesaid observation, this contempt petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
JUDGE Raju
RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.18 11:14:16 +0530