JINNURI PHANI SURYA VISWA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/33113/2025 · 2025-12-04
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50574 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50574 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010637332025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 33113/2025 Between:
1. JINNURI PHANI SURYA VISWA KUMAR, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, D.NO.2-64, JINNURU VARIPALEM, NANGAVARAM VILLAGE, UPPALAGUPTAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT-533222. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - IRRIGATION,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY- FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER SE, DHAVALESWARAM CIRCLE - RAJAHMANDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI CENTRAL DIVISION WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,
AMALAPURAM, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 5. THE ASST ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION SECTION, AINAPURAM,
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DY EE, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION SUB DIVISION, AMALAPURAM,
2 VS,J W.P.No.33113 of 2025
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS ACCOUNTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the action of the respondents in not making the payments covered under the work order Rs. 3,50,196/-. (Three Lakhs Fifty Thousand One Hundred Ninety-Six rupees) after deducting the various fees for Dr.No.95/24-25 and LS.N0.72/24-25. Though I am submitting the bill certificates as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 AND 300- A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to clear the bills covered under work order in Letter No. E.E/G.C.D/A.M.P//D.B/J.T.O-2/ 769 M Dated 06.07.2024. D.R.No.95/2024-25, for Rs.3,50,196/- respectively by raising the forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to clear the bills covered under the two work orders in Letter No. E.E/G.C.D/A.M.P//D.B/J.T.O-2/ 769 M Dated:06.07.2024 D.R.No.95/2024-25, for Rs.3,50,196/-(Three Lakhs Fifty Thousand One Hundred Ninety-Six rupees) to the petitioner along with 24% interest, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SUDHAKARA RAO.BYRISETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD
2.
GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
3 VS,J W.P.No.33113 of 2025
ORDER:
The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the action of the respondents in not making the payments covered under the work order Rs. 3,50,196/-. (Three Lakhs Fifty Thousand One Hundred Ninety-Six rupees) after deducting the various fees for Dr.No.95/24-25 and LS.N0.72/24-25. Though I am submitting the bill certificates as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 AND 300- A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to clear the bills covered under work
order in Letter No.
E.E/G.C.D/A.M.P//D.B/J.T.O-2/ 769 M Dated 06.07.2024. D.R.No.95/2024-25, for Rs.3,50,196/- respectively by raising the forthwith….”
2. The petitioner had been awarded the contract of work as per the work
order in Letter No. E.E/G.C.D/A.M.P//D.B/J.T.O-2/769 M. Dated 06.07.2024, D.R.No.95/2024-25 for Rs.3,50,196/- by the respondents. After execution of the aforementioned contract work, the respondents issued quality control certificate for work i.e., dated 25.08.2025 for a sum of Rs.3,50,196/-. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition.
3. It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sum of amount, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-
4 VS,J W.P.No.33113 of 2025
payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.
4. This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on oral instructions submits that the admitted amount payable to the petitioner as per the quality control certificate i.e., dated 25.08.2025 for a sum of Rs.3,50,196/-. He further submits that since the budget was not released by the Government, the bills were not paid to the petitioner. Soon after release of the budget by the Government, the bills will be paid to the petitioner.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances submitted in the affidavit, and the directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of
learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amounts to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificate i.e., dated 25.08.2025 for a sum of Rs.3,50,196/- issued by the respondents, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
As far as interest component is concerned, if there is any subsisting clause in the agreement/work order envisaging payment of interest upon any amount which is due and payable, the same is binding upon both the parties. There shall be no order as to costs.
5 VS,J W.P.No.33113 of 2025
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 05.12.2025 KGR