Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50573 (AP)

N RAJENDRA PRASAD v. SRI PRAVEEN PRAKASH

CC/401/2024 · 2025-09-18

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010041262024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 401/2024 Between: 1. N RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O BALAMUKUNDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O H.NO.21-2-15-41, SKD COLONY. ROAD, ADONI, KUMOOL DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PRAVEEN PRAKASH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN(APSSA), SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI S S RAWAT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI CH RAJESHWARA REDDY, MANAGING DIRECTOR, APEWIDC, D.NO.93-5-528, SRI RUCHITA, BESIDE VIJETHA SCHOOL, 2ND LANE, A.T.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. 4. MR B SRINIVASA RAO, STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN(APSSA), 3RD FLOOR, NANDANAM APARTMENT, WEST IBRAHIM, VIJAYAWADA. 5. SRI G SRUJANA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KURNOOL. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein U/s 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court for willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court passed in W.P. No. 20229 of 2023 dated 18-08-2023 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. C SUMON 2. L V S NAGARAJU 3. R SUDHA RANI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 18.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.20229 of 2023. 2. Sri M.Karibasaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 19th September, 2025 RKS