$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4579/2024, CM APPL. 10599/2026 & 10600/2026 JAMOTRI DEVI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivendra Singh, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi and Ms. Aryama Singh Rajput, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA O R D E R % 21.04.2026 REVIEW PET. 83/2026 1. The Registry reports that notice could not be served on the respondent as its premises were found locked. 2. Let fresh notice be served on Mr. Apoorv Shukla, who appeared in this matter as a Standing Counsel for the Government of Chhattisgarh when the writ petition was heard. 3. Reply, if any, may be filed within four weeks with advance copy to learned Counsel for the petitioners, who may file rejoinder thereto, if any, within four weeks thereof. 4. Needless to say, a copy of the additional affidavit filed by the review petitioner would also be served on Mr. Apoorv Shukla. 5. Re-notify on 13 July 2026. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J APRIL 21, 2026/pa This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/04/2026 at 13:07:27