Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50562 (KAR)

MADHU ALIAS MADHUMANGAL S/O VTTHALDAS KALANTRI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/104695/2025 · 2025-11-24

S Rachaiah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16405 CRL.P No. 104695 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.104695 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MADHU @ MADHUMANGAL S/O. VITTHALDAS KALANTRI, AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. FARMER, R/O. H.NO.664, VITTHALADEV GALLI, SHAHAPUR COLONY, T/Q. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590 003. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. AVINASH M.ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH MARKER POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI, REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580 011. 2. NEETA W/O. VINAYAK KUDATURAKAR W/O. VINAYAK KUDATURAKAR, AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE/OTHERS PI SPECIFY, Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16405 CRL.P No. 104695 of 2025 R/O. H/NO.778/2, KUDATURAKAR COMPOUND, KHANAPUR ROAD, TILAKAWADI, N/A. PLAT NO.SI-2, 2ND FLOOR, ARIOUS APARTMENT NEHARU ROAD, TILAKAWADI, BELAGAVI CITY, KARNATAKA, T/Q AND DIST. BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-590 006. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANIL KALE, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., (UNDER SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023) PRAYING TO, ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH COMPLAINT DATED 30.09.2025, FIR IN CRIME NO.0193/2025 WHICH IS REGISTERED BY MARKET POLICE STATION BELAGAVI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENSE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 329(4), 232, 351(2) R/W 3(5) OF BNS-2023 PENDING ON THE FILE BEFORE THE JMFC COURT-II BELAGAVI. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16405 CRL.P No. 104695 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, in terms of the memo dated 24.11.2025, with liberty to challenge the charge-sheet. Memo is placed on record. Considering the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE SMM/CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 93