Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50560 (CHH)

ASHWANI KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5754/2023 · 2025-10-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5754 of 2023 1 - Ashwani Kumar Sahu S/o Mannu Lal Sahu Aged About 37 Years Presently Posted Assistan Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School, Kopakatel, Block Durgukondal District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distict Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Divisional Joint Director, Education Division Bastar Jagdalpur, District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer Uttar Bastar Kanker District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07.10.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondents/competent authority raising all grounds as raised in this ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 writ petition along with the copy of petition and in turn, respondents/competent authority may also be directed to consider and decide the same at the earliest within any specific period as fixed by this Court. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. On the basis of submission made by both the counsel for the parties, at this stage, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to file a detailed representation regarding grant of job and raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition along with the copy of this petition before the respondent/competent authority within ‘two weeks’ from today and on submission of such representation the respondent/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the same within an outer limit of 60 days from the submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules, law, circulars and instructions applicable to the case of petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/-/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena