Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50551 (BOM)

VIJAY S/O SHALIK DODKE AND OTHERS v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR AND OTHERS

WP/6022/2024 · 2025-08-08

Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31-A wp 6022.24.odt..odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6022 /2024 Mr. Vijay s/o Shalik Dodke and ors. ...Versus… The Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. A.C. Funde, Advocate for petitioners Ms Prachi Joshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2/State. CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 08/08/2025 1. When confronted as regards availability of the alternate remedy, counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Writ Petition stands disposed of, as withdrawn. 4. However, it is made clear that time spent in prosecuting the writ petition shall be taken into consideration, if the issue of limitation crops up. 5. Order accordingly. No costs. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) Manisha 2025:BHC-NAG:7771