Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50550 (CHH)

ARJUN YADAV v. SANTOSH PATEL

MCC/582/2018 · 2025-10-28

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:52745-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 582 of 2018 Arjun Yadav S/o Shri Chhedilal Yadav Aged About 43 Years R/o Tikrapara, Bilapur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh......(Defendant No.2), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant. Versus 1 - Santosh Patel S/o Shri Imrat Lal Patel Aged About 39 Years Caste Patel Lodhi, R/o Village- Mekh, Tahsil- Motegaon, District- Nursingpur (M.P.) Presently Resided At Indrapuri Tifra, Post- Tifra, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.....(Plaintiff), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Santosh Yadav S/o Shri Chhedilal Yadav Aged About 49 Years R/o Tikrapara, Bilaspur, Disrtict- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh...... (Defendants), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Bilaspr, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents. For Applicant : None. For Res No.1 & 2 : None. For Res No.3/State : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer. SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 29.10.2025 1. On the last date of hearing i.e. 17.12.2024 none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Even today also, despite repeated calls no representation is made. Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2025.10.29 16:52:39 +0530 2 2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this MCC is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge AvinashAjay