1 APHC010334792024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17034/2024 Between: 1. KANCHAMREDDY NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. LATE K PEDHA SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2. KANCHAMREDDY SUBBI REDDY,, S/O. LATE PEDHA SUBBI REDDY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. KANCHAMREDDY MALLA REDDY,, S/O. LATE PEDHA SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. KANCHAMREDDY NAGA SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. LATE CHINNA SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. KANCHAMREDDY RAMA KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O. LATE PEDHA SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 6. KANCHAMREDDY NAGI REDDY,, S/O. LATE PEDHA SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. KANCHAMREDDY RAMACHANDRA REDDY,, S/O. LATE PEDHA SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O BAGADIPALLI VILLAGE AND REKALAKUNTA POST, B MATTAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDHUKUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B.MATTAM P.S, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, B.MATTAM MANDAL, BADVEL DIVISION, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 in interfering and threatening to dispossess the Petitioners with respect to their subject lands admeasuring an extent of Ac 1.82 cents under Sy.No.301, Ac.3.76 cents under Sy.No.332, Ac.1.10 cents under Sy.No.366 and Ac.0.04 cents under Sy.No.308 of Rekulakunta Village, B.Mattam Mandal, Kadapa District respectively without following due process of law and especially during pendency of civil suits in respect of the subject property as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 not to interfere with peaceful possession of the subject lands admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.82cents under Sy.No.301, Ac.3.76cents under Sy.No.332, Ac.1.10 cents under Sy.No.366 and Ac.0.04cents under Sy.No.308 of Rekulakunta Village, B.Mattam Mandal Kadapa District by the Petitioners without following the due process of law and pass.” 2. Heard Sri N.Ashwani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police are interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that a case in Crime No.129 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 118(1) and 351(3) read with 3(5) of BNS has been registered against 5th 3 petitioner and others. Except that, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. The police are further directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.12.2025 Asr 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17034 of 2024 Dt..22.12.2025 Asr