Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50513 (KAR)

SHRI. KUBER S/O GANAPATI NAYAK v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/101721/2025 · 2025-04-28

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6964 CRL.P No. 101721 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101721 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHRI. KUBER S/O. GANAPATI NAYAK, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O: DODDAMANI, MARGUNDI, TQ: SIRSI, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA, PIN: 581 318. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. J. PEERJADE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH EXCISE INSPECTOR, SIRSI. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA, BOTH R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH B. CHIGARI, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS) PRAYING TO THAT THE ORDER PASSED ON 17.10.2023 CONFISCATING THE TWO WHEELER TVS STAR CT PLUS BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KA-31/EC-1997 TO THE STATE IN SIRSI CRIME NO.92/2022-23/3211 SIE1/321111 BE KINDLY ORDERED TO BE QUASHED AND THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BE KINDLY ORDERED TO RELEASE THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN THE INTERESTS JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6964 CRL.P No. 101721 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. 2. Memo reads thus; “HEREIN, the memo for withdrawal on behalf of the petitioner is as under:- That the petitioner does not intend to proceed with the petition, as he intends to file another suitable petition. Therefore it is most respectfully prayed that, the petition may kindly be ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn in the interests of justice.” 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Registry is directed to return documents to learned counsel for the petitioner. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8