APHC010470532021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29685/2021 Between: 1. KOYYANA VEERA GOWRI NAIDU,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) YERRI NAIDU AGED 36 YEARS, OCC ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. KOYYANA SATYAM,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 39 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1 PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. KOYYANA SURI BABU ,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 38 YEARS, OCC VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. RONGALI RAMESH,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SATYAM AGED 52 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1 PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. RONGALI JAGANNADHAM ,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SURYANARAYANA AGED 62 YEARS, OCC 1/1, ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. RONGALI APPARAO,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SURYANARAYANA AGED 40 YEARS, OCC VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. RONGALI RAMUNAIDU,, S/O 58 YEARS, OCC VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. RONGALI VENKATA SATYAM,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SATYAM AGED 42 YEARS, OCC IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 29685/2021 KOYYANA VEERA GOWRI NAIDU,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) YERRI NAIDU AGED 36 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O D NO 1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. KOYYANA SATYAM,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 39 CULTIVATION, R/O 1-1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. KOYYANA SURI BABU ,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 38 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1-1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. GALI RAMESH,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SATYAM AGED 52 CULTIVATION, R/O 1-1/1, ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI JAGANNADHAM ,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SURYANARAYANA AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1 NANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI APPARAO,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SURYANARAYANA AGED 40 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1-1/1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI RAMUNAIDU,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) TATA BABU AGED 58 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1-1/1,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI VENKATA SATYAM,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SATYAM AGED 42 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O 1-1/1 ,ANANTAVARAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN KOYYANA VEERA GOWRI NAIDU,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) YERRI CULTIVATION, R/O D NO 1-1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL KOYYANA SATYAM,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 39 1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. KOYYANA SURI BABU ,, S/O KOYYANA (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. GALI RAMESH,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SATYAM AGED 52 1/1, ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI JAGANNADHAM ,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) CULTIVATION, R/O 1- NANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL RONGALI APPARAO,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SURYANARAYANA 1/1 ,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI (LATE) TATA BABU AGED 1/1,ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. RONGALI VENKATA SATYAM,, S/O RONGALI (LATE) SATYAM 1/1 ,ANANTAVARAM 2 BKM,J W.P.No.29685 of 2021 VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. CHAPPA MAHESWARA RAO ,, S/O CHAPPA (LATE) RAMU AGED 45 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 10. CHAPPA SIVANNARAYANA,, S/O CHAPPA (LATE) SIMHACHALAM AGED 61 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 11. CHAPPA SANYASI NAIDU ,, S/O CHAPPA SIVANNARAYANA AGED 43 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 12. KASIREDDY PENTAYYA,, S/O KASI REDDY (LATE) PENTAYYA AGED 88 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 13. KSIREDDY NARASIMHA NAIDU,, S/O ERRIGADU, AGED 57 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 14. SIRIPURAPU APPA RAO,, S/O SIRIPURAPU (LATE) NARAYANA AGED 62 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O.ANANTAVARAM VILLAGE, PADMANABHAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.2,3 and 4 in resorting to dispossess the petitioners from their Mango Orchid for the purpose of housing scheme NAVARATNALU PEDALANDARIKI ILLU is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14,21 and 300A of the 3 BKM,J W.P.No.29685 of 2021 Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the Mango Orchid of the petitioners covered by Sy No 16-2,19- 2,19-3,20-1,20-2,21-2 and 21-3 of Ananthavaram Village, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2,3 and 4 not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective Mango Orchidscovered by Survey No. 16- 2,19-2, 19-3, 20-1,20-2, 21-2 and 21-3 of Anantavaram Village, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District by cutting the existing mango trees, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M V S ANIL KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 4 BKM,J W.P.No.29685 of 2021 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioners. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the staff of the respondent Nos.2, 3 & 4 in resorting to dispossess the petitioners from their Mango Orchid for the purpose of housing scheme, covered by survey No.16-2, Ac.1.24 cents in survey No.19-2, Ac.1.96 cents in survey No.19-3, Ac.1.61 cents in survey No.20-1, Ac.1.26 cents in survey No.20-2, Ac.0.68 cents in survey No.21-2 and Ac.0.54 cents in survey No.21-3 of Ananthavaram Village, Padmanabham Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 24.09.2025, submits that the land covered by survey No.19/3 to an extent of Ac.1.96 cents was classified as “Anadheena Punja” (A.W.D), vested with the Government. The schedule lands were previously proposed for housing scheme. But, later, it was dropped by the then Revenue Officials and no house site pattas were issued. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. The written instructions of the 4th respondent 5 BKM,J W.P.No.29685 of 2021 dated 24.09.2025 shall be made as part of the Court record. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 06.10.2025 MDP