Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50502 (AP)

L.Manjula v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/30134/2025 · 2025-12-08

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010586032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30134/2025 Between: 1. L.MANJULA, W/O.L.DANAKUMAR . AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS D.NO.9-254, MANGALAM QUARTERS,SETTIPALLI, TIRUPATI URBAN,TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH,INDIA-517507. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH . 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERST WHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERST WHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the acts of respondent No. 4 as it is illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 and 300A of constitution of India and also direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners 2 possession over the above said land and also direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the said land and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession over the above said land, pending disposal of Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30134 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the acts of respondent No.4 as it is illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 and 300A of constitution of India and also direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession over the above said land and also direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the said land and pass...…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition. 4. Permission accorded. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 09.12.2025 SNI 4 181 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 30134 OF 2025 Dt.09.12.2025 SNI