Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50497 (ALL)

ANURAG SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/1117/2025 · 2025-05-13

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79034 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1117 of 2025 Applicant :- Anurag Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- J Shubham,Jitendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.317 of 2016, arising out of case crime no. 365 of 2015, under Section 63/65 Copy Right Act, Police Station- Kayamganj, District- Farrukhabad pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the accused in the said case. It is further submitted that the case is very old pertains to the year 2016 and still pending at the stage of prosecution evidence and no witness has been adduced by the prosecution so far, whereas the accused is appearing before the Court regularly either personally or through counsel. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. Since the case the very old, the Court concerned is directed to conclude the prosecution evidence as far as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad