APHC010491162023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25443/2023 Between: 1. TATIPARTI ESWARA REDDY, S/O. LATE CHENCHUREDDY, AGED ABOUT 75YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR R/O. EMPEDU VILLAGE, CALAHASTI MANDAL, TILRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATH RAJ 86 RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, , PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, DPO OFFICE AT COLLECTORATE BUILDINGS, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR-DIVISION, TIRUPATI DIVISION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, , SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT 6. THE PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, EMPEDU GRAM PANCHAYATH, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 7. THE SURPANCH, EMPEDU GRAM PANCHAYATH, SRIKALAHASTI, 2 TIRUPATI (CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 2,3 and 5 in not taking action against the 7th respond.ent for his non cooperation with 6th respondent in respect of the payment made to the petitioner as per the HON'BLE HIGH COURT orders in WP NO.39509/2002 dt.16-12-2022 by withholding the amounts Rs. 3,46,128/-payable to me under MNREGS and STSP (ST-Sub Plan) as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the. A.P Panchayath Raj Act, ar d consequently direct the respondents No. 2,3 AND 7 to take necessary action against 7th respondent for his non cooperation with 6th respondent in respect of the payment made to the petitioner as per the HONBLE HIGH COURT orders in WP NO.39509/2002 dt.16-12-2022 in granting payments of Rs. 3,46,128/-- payable to the petitioner FOR executing the work I. CONSTRUCTION OF C.C. ROAD AT MAIN ROAD (YC ROAD) EASTSIDE INTERNAL STREETS OF ESWARAIAH COLONY OF EMFEDU GRAMPANCHAYAT OF SRI KALAHSTI MANDAL under MNREGS and STSP (ST-Sub Plan) for the work i.e., (90percent AND 30percent ) (STSP Share) under MGNREGS Scheme vide Agreement No. /2018-19, dated 22.09.2018 and to pass such pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2,3 and 5 to take necessary action in granting payments of Rs. 3,46,128/ /- payable to the petitioner as balance amount work executed under MNREGS and STSP (ST-Sub Plan) for the CONSTUCTION OF CC ROAD AT MAIN ROAD(Y C ROAD) EAST SIDE INTERNAL STREETS OF ESWARAIAH COLONY OF EMPEDU GP SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL under (STSP Share) ST SUB PLAN and MGNREGS Scheme e vide Agreement No. /2018-19, dated 22.09.2018 pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon'ble court, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R CHANDRA REDDY 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER: Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amount to the petitioner for construction of C.C. Road at main road (YC road) east side internal streets of Eswaraiah Colony of Empedu Gram Panchayat, Srikalahsti Mandal, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri J.Subba Rao, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the authorities have paid the entitled amounts to the petitioner and there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th December, 2025 RKS