Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50490 (PNJ)

RAJKUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/11885/2025 · 2025-04-30

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-11885-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11885-2025 Date of Decision: 30.04.2025 Rajkumar ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Kamal Kant, Advocate, for the petitioner (appearing through video conferencing). Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for respondent No.1, also appearing as Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 21.01.2022 (Annexure P-1) whereby he was placed under suspension and charge sheet dated (Annexure P-2) which is still pending. 2. The petitioner already stands reinstated, thus, his prayer qua setting aside of suspension order does not survive. 3. Mr. Kamal Kant submits that charge sheet is pending since February’ 2022 and it is causing prejudice to him. Shivani Gupta 2025.04.30 15:45 CWP-11885-2025 2 4. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent No.1 to 5, submits that inquiry initiated by aforesaid charge sheet would be completed within 6 months from today. 5. Mr. Kamal Kant agrees with afore-mentioned arrangement. 6. In the wake of statement of both sides, instant petition stands disposed of. 30.04.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.04.30 15:45