Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50488 (CHH)

HUSEN CHAND PRAKASH DAHIRE v. SMT. HEMPUSHPA DAHIRE

CRR/60/2024 · 2025-08-10

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40122 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 60 of 2024 Husen Chand Prakash Dahire S/o Late Ramsahay Dahire Aged About 50 Years R/o Ambedkar Ward Mungeli Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh Current Address Kapil Nagar, Sarkanda, Near Muktidham, House Of Rajpoot Sir, P.S. Sarkanda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Hempushpa Dahire W/o Husen Chand Prakash Dahire, Aged About 36 Years R/o Ambedkar Ward Mungeli P.S. Tahsil And District Mungeli P.S. Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh Current Address Dandgaon, Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mayank Dahire S/o Husen Chand Prakash Dahire Aged About 15 Years Minor Through Natural Gaurdian, Mother Smt. Hempushpa Dahire W/o Husen Chand Prakash Dahire, R/o Ambedkar Ward Mungeli P.S. Tahsil And District Mungeli P.S. Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh Current Address Dandgaon, Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 3 - Jayant Dahire S/o Husen Chand Prakash Dahire Aged About 12 Years Minor Through Natural Gaurdian, Mother Smt. Hempushpa Dahire W/o Husen Chand Prakash Dahire, R/o Ambedkar Ward Mungeli P.S. Tahsil And District Mungeli P.S. Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh Current Address Dandgaon, Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent : Mr. Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 11.08.2025 1. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with following prayer: “ It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 be pleased to allow the revision petitioner and quashed the order dated 22.09.2023, in the interest of justice. ” 2. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision when the case is called out. 3. It appears that the applicant has lost his interest to pursue this matter. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Let a certified copy of this order be transmitted to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar