APHC010559082012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 268/2012 Between: 1. MADAPATI SURYAVATHI, W/O. LATE SEETHA RAMA REDDY INAMDARINI R/O. UBALANKA, RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT. 2. MEDAPTI SRINIVAS REDDY, S/O. LATE SEETHA RAMA REDDY BUSINESS R/O. UBALANKA, RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, E.G. DISTRICT. 3. SMT. TADI SUSEELA, W/O. SATHI SAI BABA REDDY R/O. JUPUDY VILLAGE, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL E.G. DISTRICT. 4. SMT.NANDI SUSEELA DEVI, D/O. LATE SEETHA RAMA RAO R/O. DANAVAIPETA, REJAHMUNDRY, E.G. DISTRICT. 5. M.V. ANIL KUMAR REDDY, S/O. LATE SEETHA RAMA REDDY BUSINESS R/O. DANAVAIPETA, REJAHMUNDRY, E.G. DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. M/S MADAPTI SEETHARAMAREDDYSATHI CHANDRA REDDY, REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM , REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SATHI CHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE CHANDRA REDDY, 51 YRS, BUSINESS R/O. DANAVAIPETA, 2. SATHI CHANDRA REDDY HINDU, S/O. LATE CHANDRA REDDY BUSINESS R/O. DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SMT SATHI KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O. CHANDRA REDDY INAMDARINI R/O. DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SATHI ASHOK REDDY, S/O. CHANDRA REDDY AGED NOT KNOWN, BUSINESS R/O. DANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE REGISTRAR, NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(ASMP 835 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the decree and Judgment dt. 22-3-2012 passed in OS No. 2 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the V Addl. District Judge (FTC) East Godavari at Rajahmundry pending disposal of the above appeal and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2012(ASMP 1097 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time by 6 weeks in ASMP.No. 835 of 2012 in AS.No. 268 of 2012 to comply order dt. 09/04/2012 IA NO: 3 OF 2012(ASMP 1878 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order of interim suspension made in ASMP No.835 of 2012 in A.S.No.268 of 2012 dated 09.04.2012 and to pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 268/2012 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) No representation for the appellants even in the revised call. 2. Sri N.Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents is present. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2012 and is listed in the weekly list. 4. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for “want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 07.10.2025 AG 56 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 268/2012 Dated: 07.10.2025 AG